by Graham Readfearn via Readfearn.com
The New York Times reported how the man died when a tree fell on his house in Queens. The former-Hurricane Sandy has already claimed more than 60 lives in Caribbean countries.
There are something like 50 million Americans currently in the
storm’s path. It seems inevitable that more people will lose their lives
in the coming hours.
Whatever transpires we no doubt all hope that the number of
fatalities is low. But neither good fortune nor any god will decide. The
death toll will be what it is, and families will grieve.
It seems insensitive to mention the billions of dollars of damage the
storm will cause. It might, to some, seem insensitive to mention
human-caused climate change at a time like this.
But given that neither Mitt Romney nor Barack Obama had the courage,
the foresight or the necessary leadership qualities to be able to
mention the issue in their official debates, I’d say
their insensitivity is far greater than any which a freelance journo and
blogger across the Pacific may be able to muster.
But the evidence would suggest that it is reckless to ignore the hand
which burning coal (some of it Australia’s), oil and gas and tearing
down forests has had on this storm and is having on extreme weather events across the world.
Adding billions of tonnes of additional greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere each year is loading the climate dice. When you roll the
dice, the chances of getting extremes such as droughts, heatwaves and
In The Conversation,
scientist Gary W Yohe lists some of these recent extremes, we’ve been
witnessing, including the super-storm Sandy, and suggests that we’re now
living in a climate which is transitioning to something for which we
don’t have any yardstick from our recent past. This is, argues Yohe, not
so much a “new normal” but more a journey to somewhere much less
Writing for Mother Jones, Chris Mooney
pulls together some of the ways that human activities have likely
influenced Sandy, such as the unusually high sea temperatures in the
Atlantic. “Warm oceans are jet fuel for hurricanes,” writes Mooney.
Also on The Conversation,
climate scientist Kevin Trenberth discusses the contribution of rising
sea temperatures to Sandy’s muscular gait while keeping a close eye on
his wife and daughter as they evacuate New Jersey.
In an LA Times examination of the role of human-caused climate change in Sandy’s make-up,
Trenberth adds that “All weather events are affected by climate change
because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than
it used to be.”
New York’s financial district is also “moister than it used to be” as reports come in of cars floating down Wall St. The next few days are uncertain.
But what you can guarantee is that climate science deniers will seek
to downplay the role of climate change in events like Sandy, or in the
US droughts, or the floods of recent years in Pakistan, Russia and
Australia, or the tumbling of heat records across the US.
Late last week, PBS screened a documentary as part of their Frontline series called “Climate of Doubt” which looked at the ongoing campaign to demonise and misrepresent the science of climate change.
The show used the climate science denying think tank the Heartland
Institute’s recent sixth conference on climate change as a hook. The
show (watch below) interviewed many of the current protagonists of
climate science denial – the “scientists” and professionals who are paid
to carry out this work to confuse and fool the public, intimidate
climate scientists and push their own political agenda where fossil fuel
corporations can operate with near impunity in a “free market”.
I recently catalogued the Australian supporters of Heartland’s climate science conferences for DeSmogBlog.
The PBS show also highlighted how rich conservative-leaning free
market-loving individuals use a secretive slush fund to pay for the work
of the climate denialists, an issue I also covered for DeSmogBlog earlier this ear.
Featured in the show is Dr Fred Singer,
a retired physicist and one of the world’s most prominent science
contrarians who once helped the tobacco industry to undermine the links
between second-hand smoke and cancer.
Singer, currently an adviser to Australian climate sceptic group the
galileo Movement, was also hosted twice by Australia’s Institute for
Public Affairs in the early 90s as the Melbourne-based free market think
tank began to build its anti-climate science campaign, which continues
to this day. Also featured in the PBS documentary was Myron Ebell, a
director at the Competitive Enterprise Institute which was another group
active in helping to build early support for climate science denial in
The Cato Institute’s Pat Michaels, who once admitted that 40 per cent
of his funding came from the fossil fuel industry, was also featured.
Michaels is currently an advisor to the newly-formed Australian
Taxpayers’ Alliance. And of course, no documentary on climate science
denial would be complete without a few sage words from the madcap Lord
Broadly, it’s obvious what effect these orchestrated campaigns of
doubt on climate science (and also attacks on renewable energies) are
designed to have. They want to delay any laws that will help the
developed and developing world to move away from what should be seen as a
risk-laden fossil fuel habit. They also have an innate paranoia of
socialism and communism.
They claim that environmental legislation is taking away people’s
“freedoms”. I wonder if that includes the freedom to be evacuated from a
massive storm, the freedom to have your crops wiped out by drought or
the freedom to pay increased taxes to pay for clean-ups from “natural”
Before Hurricane Sandy hit, on Forbes’ Corporate Social Responsibility blog, Gregory Unruh asked if climate denialists would be seen in the future as having committed “climate crimes against humanity”.
In my eyes, the answer to this is no because there are people who
have the power to ignore their campaign. As storm system Sandy breaks
American hearts, it puts the US Presidential campaigns on hold and
brings Wall Street, a spiritual home for capitalism, to a stand still.
Will it be long enough for leaders like Obama, Cameron, Gillard and Jiabao to ask just where their “leadership” is taking us?